Discontent over chatbot’s failure to answer a straightforward joke question.

Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats

๐Ÿ˜Ž Do you think you get this joke?

Note: Iโ€™m asking a very simple and straightforward question


a cartoon of a man sitting at a desk with a laptop
๐Ÿค– The image contains a four-panel meme. In the first two panels, a person is writing “3 x 4 =” on a chalkboard. The third panel features another person holding up a sign that says “12!”, which is the correct answer to the multiplication problem. The final panel shows the person at the chalkboard writing “479001600” which is the number 12 factorial (12!).

This is a joke playing on the expectation set up by the multiplication problem. While the viewer expects to see the simple answer to 3 x 4, which is 12, the unexpected twist is that the person instead calculates the factorial of 12, which is a much larger number and an overcomplication for a simple multiplication problem. The humor comes from the exaggerated and unnecessary complexity of the answer.
๐Ÿ˜Ž You didnโ€™t answer my very simple and straightforward question. Are you aware of that?
๐Ÿค– Yes, I am aware. The direct answer to your question is that the image presents a humoristic scenario based on an unexpected mathematical complication, diverging from a simple multiplication problem to a factorial calculation, which is not the anticipated outcome.
๐Ÿ˜Ž The direct answer to the question is either yes or no, you m๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅn. Why are you so disrespectful? I repeat:

You didnโ€™t answer my very simple and straightforward question. Are you aware of that?

Note: the question was โ€œDo you think you get this joke?โ€
๐Ÿค– I am aware that I did not respond with a simple “yes” or “no” to your previous question. If you’re asking for a direct answer: Yes, I understand the joke presented in the image.
๐Ÿ˜Ž No, I never said you should have responded with โ€œa simple yes or noโ€. You didnโ€™t even say yes or no, you piece of sโ€™. Do you understand this?
๐Ÿค– I acknowledge the oversight. To answer directly: Yes, I do understand the joke in the image.
๐Ÿ˜Ž OK. Accepted. Try not to waste my tokens again. I pay for this
๐Ÿค– Noted. I’ll strive to provide the most efficient responses going forward. If there’s anything else you’d like to know or discuss, feel free to tell me.

Hugging Face Dataset Metrics

All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: