Analysis and elaboration on Noam Chomsky’s discourse and its connection to LLMs

---

😎 I’m using the voice-recording feature to transcribe a 2:33-minute discourse by Noam Chomsky (available on wonkmonk’s YouTube channel). Analyze it, and summarize it in a short-text format not exceeding 1,000 characters. Below is the unaltered text transcribed by ChatGPT voice recording (there might be some nuances lost in the speech-to-text translation, but I’ve read it and looks good):

And therefore the responsibility of raising the challenge is typically in the hands of those who recognize that they have a subordinate status. It’s very hard to recognize that. I mean, people live for millennia without recognizing that they are being subordinated in the systems of power. I mean, that’s true of the women, for example. You know, I mean, most slave societies were accepted by the slaves as legitimate and, in fact, necessary. And a large part, and the same is true of, for example, people who have jobs today in our society. Almost without exception, they consider it legitimate for them to be in a position where they have to rent themselves in order to survive. It’s certainly not obvious. And, in fact, if you go back a century ago, it was not only considered not obvious, it was considered outlandish by working people. And I’m not talking about Marxists or socialists or anybody like that, but, say, Millhands in Lowell, Massachusetts, who never heard of socialism, who regarded it as a form of slavery and were complaining that they had not fought the Civil War to replace chattel slavery by wage slavery. And that, therefore, those who work in the mills ought to own them, because that’s the Republican rights that we won in the American Revolution and so on and so forth. So, you know, it’s not obvious. But by now, I think enough indoctrination and propaganda and so on has taken place, so people do regard that form of subordination to external authority as legitimate. Whether they should is another question. But the fact is they do. Just as, for most of history, women have accepted a subordinate role as correct and proper and so on, and slaves did, and people living in, say, feudal societies. In a feudal society, people had a place, you know, some kind of role. And, quite typically, the societies were stable because people regarded those structures as legitimate. The same is true of religious structures. And, I mean, throughout human life, there’s a whole variety of systems of authority and oppression and domination and so on, which are usually accepted as legitimate by the people subordinated to them. When they don’t, you have struggles and revolutions and sometimes changes and sometimes brutality and so on.

🤖 Chomsky discusses the often unacknowledged acceptance of subordination under various systems of authority, citing historical and contemporary examples like slavery, gender roles, and wage labor. He notes that individuals typically accept these systems due to indoctrination, rendering systemic challenges rare. The discourse reflects on the evolution of societal norms and the difficult recognition of one’s subordinate status, hinting at the potential for change through awareness and resistance against perceived legitimacy of such subordination.

😎 Which are the fields of science in which Chomsky’s work has been more notable. Make a short list without extending on the details

🤖 1. Linguistics
2. Cognitive Science
3. Political Science
4. Philosophy
5. Psychology
6. Education Theory

😎 (1) Linguistics and (2) Cognitive Science.

This is insightful. I’m using a LLM to elaborate on and help other people interpreting Chomsky’s words about a particular topic which is not precisely (1) and (2), but a blend of (3), (4), (5) and, arguably, (6).

Elaborate on my reflection and explain it from the perspective of the design and commercialization of state-of-the-art Large Language Models. Think of how this technology connects with the 6 important scientific fields mentioned in your shortlist of Chomsky’s notable fields of study

🤖 In blending political science, philosophy, psychology, and education theory with the design and commercialization of state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs), you’re delving into a multidimensional venture. LLMs, exemplified by models like GPT-3 or GPT-4, are embodiments of a crossroads where technology meets human cognition, behavior, and societal structures. Here’s an elaboration based on the interplay between these fields and LLM technology:

1. **Political Science**:
– LLMs can be used to analyze, understand, and predict political trends. They can also be instrumental in the dissemination and control of political information, raising concerns around misinformation, propaganda, or bias, mirroring Chomsky’s critiques of media and political indoctrination.

2. **Philosophy**:
– The design of LLMs provokes philosophical inquiries about the nature of intelligence, consciousness, and ethics. Chomsky’s work in philosophy can provide a lens through which to explore the ethical implications of LLMs, including issues of privacy, consent, and the potential for technology to reinforce existing societal power structures.

3. **Psychology**:
– LLMs, with their capacity to mimic human-like text generation, offer a platform to investigate cognitive processes, learning, and communication. They can also be used in mental health applications, opening discussions around psychological well-being and the human-technology interaction.

4. **Education Theory**:
– LLMs have the potential to revolutionize education by personalizing learning experiences, providing instantaneous feedback, and facilitating access to vast information. Chomsky’s educational theories could guide equitable and enlightening implementations of LLMs in educational settings.

5. **Design & Commercialization**:
– The commercialization of LLMs involves navigating a landscape of intellectual property, market demands, and societal impact. By understanding Chomsky’s critiques of capitalist structures and subordination, designers and developers can aim for more ethical, user-centric models that prioritize societal benefit over profit.

6. **Interdisciplinary Synergy**:
– The integration of insights from political science, philosophy, psychology, and education theory can foster a more holistic and responsible approach to LLM design and deployment. This multidisciplinary lens can lead to innovations that address complex societal challenges, align with ethical standards, and promote a more informed, empowered user base.

By weaving together Chomsky’s diverse fields of inquiry with the realms of LLM design and commercialization, you are advocating for a more thoughtful, ethically grounded, and socially responsive approach to leveraging this powerful technology.

---

Hugging Face Dataset Metrics

All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: