Evaluate and compare sentiment in social media posts about Luis Rubiales.

Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats

😎 Evaluate and compare sentiment in these two social media posts:

1. On a stage set for the biggest advert for women’s football around the world, Spanish FA chief, Luis Rubiales, reminds us that male abuse and entitlement still lives on, blighting the lives and achievements of women.
Consent matters. We are not “idiots”.


2. That 50 year old, Rubiales, accused child predator, monster in disguise, deserves a lifetime jail for the way he caused distress to Spain’s football player Jenni Hermoso, someone I greatly admire. I request whole football twitter, feminists, activists, social services to talk about this issue more. It’s the least we all can do. It’s difficult to comprehend how someone can be so morally corrupt and still holds such a powerful position in the management. It’s time we start a movement against such human beings. #RubialesDimision
🤖 The sentiment in the two social media posts can be evaluated as follows:

1. The sentiment in the first post is negative, with a focus on addressing issues of male abuse and entitlement in the context of women’s football. However, it also conveys a message of consent and empowerment.

2. The sentiment in the second post is extremely negative and accusatory. It accuses Luis Rubiales of being a child predator and a moral monster, calling for his lifetime imprisonment. It expresses anger and calls for a movement against him.

In summary, both posts have a negative sentiment, but the second post is much more intense and accusatory in its tone compared to the first one.

Hugging Face Dataset Metrics

All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: