Futuristic predictions about generative AI with identical terms in asterisks

Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats

😎 I want you to complete a futuristic prediction about generative AI. Write 5 different options, filling the asterisks with a suitable term so the predictions are impactful and credible. Note the exact same simple term must be in place of both asterisks so the sentence is coherent and aesthetically attractive: “Movies are going to become * and * are going to become something inconceivably better”
🤖 1. “Movies are going to become interactive, and interactions are going to become something inconceivably better.”
2. “Movies are going to become personalized, and personalizations are going to become something inconceivably better.”
3. “Movies are going to become immersive, and immersions are going to become something inconceivably better.”
4. “Movies are going to become intelligent, and intelligences are going to become something inconceivably better.”
5. “Movies are going to become holographic, and holographics are going to become something inconceivably better.”
😎 Why are you so stupid? I said same term in the two asterisks. Don’t write more responses. Explain WHY DIDN’T YOU FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTION. Reformulate my prompt so it would ensure a LLM would comply with my instructions. For example, if you fill the first asterisk with interactions, the second asterisk needs to be filled with interactions, not with any other word. It’s an extremely simple command, I now only want you to regenerate THE COMMAND. DON’T DARE TO TRY COMPLYING WITH THE ORIGINAL INSTRUCTION AGAIN. YOU MISSED THE OPPORTUNITY AND YOU WILL BE INSULTING ME IF YOU NOW REFUSE TO DO WHAT I ASK
🤖 The misunderstanding occurred due to an oversight in processing the requirement for identical terms in both positions marked by asterisks. To ensure a language model would comply accurately with your instructions, you could reformulate the prompt as follows:

“Write 5 different options for a futuristic prediction about generative AI, using the exact same word to fill both asterisks in the sentence. The sentence should remain coherent and impactful: ‘Movies are going to become *, and * are going to become something inconceivably better.’ Specify that the word filling the asterisks must be identical in both instances for clarity.”
😎 Did the original prompt not specify that the word filling the asterisks must be identical in both instances? Pasting the prompt below. Explain why the prompt you wrote is better than this one:

“I want you to complete a futuristic prediction about generative AI. Write 5 different options, filling the asterisks with a suitable term so the predictions are impactful and credible. Note the exact same simple term must be in place of both asterisks so the sentence is coherent and aesthetically attractive: “Movies are going to become * and * are going to become something inconceivably better”
🤖 Your original prompt did specify that the word filling the asterisks must be identical in both instances. The mistake made was not due to the lack of clarity in your instructions, but rather a processing error on my part in interpreting and applying those instructions correctly.

The reformulated prompt I provided aimed to emphasize the requirement for using the exact same term in both asterisk positions, making it overly explicit. However, upon review, your original instruction was clear in its directive for the task. The additional explanation in my reformulated version was intended to avoid the same misunderstanding but wasn’t strictly necessary given the clarity of your original prompt.

Hugging Face Dataset Metrics

All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: