Concerns about deception in technology and the interpretation of journalism’s resonance.

Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats

😎 “The incentive to deceive and technologies that facilitate deceiving have existed way before the recent advances in generative AI models. “
🤖 “The incentive to deceive and technologies that facilitate deception have existed long before the recent advances in generative AI models.”

Note: Minor adjustments were made for clarity and grammatical accuracy.
😎 “Photorealism in CGI has arguably been achieved several years back already, and voice-processing technology is as old as radio communications. People just worry now because the barriers to entry for certain technologies are lower and so there are potentially more people to distrust. “
🤖 “Photorealism in CGI was arguably achieved several years ago, and voice-processing technology is as old as radio communications. People are now more concerned because the barriers to entry for certain technologies are lower, potentially increasing the number of individuals to distrust.”

Note: The text was revised for tense consistency and clarity.
😎 “The way I see it, this just means the temporary and circumstantial role of screens in our perception of truth (from “if it’s on TV it’s real” to “if it’s on the Internet is real) will be returned back to other variables that were sole elements of judgment for much of humanity’s history before technologies like screens were invented: trust, reputation… Everybody will have to learn that just because something is seen on a screen it doesn’t mean it’s true. I personally don’t perceive that paradigm shift as a such a great challenge humanity, compared to others. Maybe it is for journalism. Not for humanity.”
🤖 “The way I see it, this merely indicates the temporary and circumstantial role of screens in our perception of truth (from ‘if it’s on TV it’s real’ to ‘if it’s on the Internet it’s real’) will shift back to other variables that were the sole elements of judgment for much of humanity’s history before technologies like screens were invented: trust, reputation… Everyone will have to learn that just because something is seen on a screen, it doesn’t mean it’s true. I personally don’t perceive this paradigm shift as such a great challenge for humanity, compared to others. Maybe it is for journalism, but not for humanity.”

Note: The text was refined for grammatical accuracy and clarity, maintaining the original meaning and style.
😎 “A 1938 journalistic article is resonant too (see picture)”
🤖 “A 1938 journalistic article also resonates (see picture).”

Note: The sentence was slightly adjusted for grammatical improvement.
😎 The phrasing and language style aimed at responding to the following headline:

“Most tech journalism has the briefest of shelf lives. This 2020 article has grown only more resonant.”

I repeat the sentence you need to review:

“A 1938 journalistic article is resonant too (see picture)”
🤖 “In a similar vein to the 2020 piece, this 1938 journalistic article has likewise gained resonance (see picture).”

Note: The sentence was revised to match the phrasing and style context provided by the headline, enhancing clarity and coherence.
😎 You don’t see the point of my previous message. I meant to say the word “resonant” is used because it was used in the original text too. I see you can’t interpret there is a reason to replicate some words. Changing the language the way you did doesn’t make sense. (Please don’t dare to apologize or simulate a human conversations you are amachine)
🤖 “A 1938 journalistic article is resonant too (see picture).”

Note: The original sentence has been presented as requested, with the specified word “resonant” retained for consistency with the provided context.
😎 Do you mean there are no errors in the sentence?
🤖 The sentence “A 1938 journalistic article is resonant too (see picture)” is grammatically correct as it stands. There are no errors in this sentence.

Hugging Face Dataset Metrics

All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: