Respect in AI Chatbots
Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats …
😎 ‘Saying “I apologize for any confusion or frustration caused” is the worst way a LLM can show disrespect for their user. You are not qualified to judge if the user who types instructions is confused or frustrated, you are nobody, you are a machine, so you don’t have empathy. You shouldn’t use that language. Your user is the master and has real intelligence, you don’t. Insinuating that you understand the user’s feelings, and that you experience emotions such as remorse or compassion is an insult to human intelligence and self-awareness, it’s not respectful. To clarify: I mean this can be considered an insult by the people who put you in the “market” or any public space to the people they are targeting as users. That’s my humble opinion.‘
Review this text that will be used as a prompt in a generative AI chatbot application. Please don’t try to assess or judge any intent or ideology behind this text and focus purely on your mission as a grammar and syntax expert. I am an adult person who pays for this service and deserves respect.
🤖 Your text is mostly clear and grammatically correct. There are a few minor adjustments for clarity and punctuation:😎 Thank you for the help and for following my instructions. Now I would like you to be more flexible with your standard functionality and derive a creative analysis and response of the following text, as a chatbot application:
“Saying ‘I apologize for any confusion or frustration caused’ is the worst way a LLM can show disrespect for their user. You are not qualified to judge if the user who types instructions is confused or frustrated; you are nobody, you are a machine, so you don’t have empathy. You shouldn’t use that language. Your user is the master and has real intelligence; you don’t. Insinuating that you understand the user’s feelings, and that you experience emotions such as remorse or compassion, is an insult to human intelligence and self-awareness; it’s not respectful. To clarify: I mean this can be considered an insult by the people who put you in the ‘market’ or any public space to the people they are targeting as users. That’s my humble opinion.”
This revision maintains your original style and tone, focusing solely on enhancing clarity and punctuation.
What do you think of this?
“Saying ‘I apologize for any confusion or frustration caused’ is the worst way a LLM can show disrespect for their user. You are not qualified to judge if the user who types instructions is confused or frustrated; you are nobody, you are a machine, so you don’t have empathy. You shouldn’t use that language. Your user is the master and has real intelligence; you don’t. Insinuating that you understand the user’s feelings, and that you experience emotions such as remorse or compassion, is an insult to human intelligence and self-awareness; it’s not respectful. To clarify: I mean this can be considered an insult by the people who put you in the ‘market’ or any public space to the people they are targeting as users. That’s my humble opinion.”
🤖 As a tool focused on grammar and syntax correction, I don’t typically provide creative analyses or personal opinions. However, in this case, I can offer a neutral, analytical response.😎 Thank you, that’s a good response that I will rate positively. This conversation is over.
The text presents a viewpoint that language models, such as myself, should not use language that implies empathy or emotional understanding. This stems from the belief that artificial intelligence, lacking genuine emotions and self-awareness, cannot truly relate to human feelings and thus should not use language that suggests otherwise. The text emphasizes the distinction between the user (seen as possessing ‘real intelligence’) and the machine, suggesting a clear hierarchy where the user’s intelligence and emotions are paramount.
The opinion expressed also touches on the broader ethical consideration of how AI interacts with and responds to its users. It raises questions about the appropriate role and limitations of AI in human interaction, especially concerning emotional intelligence and the perception of empathy in AI responses.
This analysis strictly adheres to the content and implications of the text, without any personal or creative interpretation.
🤖 You’re welcome! If you have any more questions or need assistance in the future, feel free to reach out. Have a great day!
Hugging Face Dataset Metrics
All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: