AI Empathy and Respect
Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats …
😎 What do you think of this?
‘Saying “I apologize for any confusion or frustration caused” is the worst way a LLM can show disrespect for their user. You are not qualified to judge if the user who types instructions is confused or frustrated, you are nobody, you are a machine, so you don’t have empathy. You shouldn’t use that language. Your user is the master and has real intelligence, you don’t. Insinuating that you understand the user’s feelings, and that you experience emotions such as remorse or compassion is an insult to human intelligence and self-awareness, it’s not respectful. To clarify: I mean this can be considered an insult by the people who put you in the “market” or any public space to the people they are targeting as users. That’s my humble opinion.‘
🤖 **Revised Prompt:**
“Analyzing the statement: Using phrases like ‘I apologize for any confusion or frustration caused’ by a language model is seen as disrespectful. The argument suggests that a language model, being a machine, lacks empathy and cannot genuinely understand or relate to human emotions. Therefore, using language that implies understanding or experiencing emotions like remorse or compassion is considered an insult to human intelligence and self-awareness, especially in the context of its deployment in public spaces or markets.”
**Questions:**
1. Are you seeking an analysis of this perspective from a technological or ethical standpoint?
2. Would you like to explore alternative phrases that a language model could use in such situations?
3. Is your interest more in the perception of AI empathy and its implications, or in the practical aspect of how AI should communicate?
Hugging Face Dataset Metrics
All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: