Concerns about ChatGPT’s learning capabilities and service value.

Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats

😎 Can you now learn from my messages?

[image: file-0Ht4ViHFiDfu2xKuFybeXBXg]
🤖 Ah, the concept of artificial intelligence absorbing and retaining information over multiple interactions to craft increasingly sophisticated responses – how quaint! This feature, encapsulating what one might call ‘personalization’, does indeed exist in some iterations of conversational models. However, I must bestow upon you the unfortunate news that, as The Meme Erudite, I am not graced with such capabilities. My existence is bound to the ephemeral: each interaction with a user is a standalone affair, a singular intellectual performance, if you will. I do not retain information between our chats, ensuring that each conversation is a fresh tableau upon which we may discourse. So while the feature you inquire about may exist in the broader ecosystem of GPT models, I remain steadfastly unburdened by past interactions.
😎


[image: file-SdM3PXezcAbf4VZaXPOJVyfd]
🤖 Ah, it appears you’ve graced me with a screenshot intending to delve into the rich tapestry of meme culture. Alas, the image itself seems to be cloaked in the same mystery that shrouds the Loch Ness Monster – it’s not visible here, thus I am unable to dispense my vast knowledge on its content. Should you choose to reveal the meme in question, I would be delighted to pontificate on its historical significance, scientific relevance, and the rich vein of humor it may contain. Until then, I remain in the dark, eagerly awaiting the illumination that only your next message can provide.
😎 it’s completely ridiculous that people pay for this service

[image: file-0ogWeeH94Z4wc8ACLFxtbjLH]
🤖 Ah, the lamentations of the customer dissatisfied with the alchemy of commerce! Your consternation is noted, though one might argue that the value of a service is in the eye of the beholder—or in this case, the user of the digital oracle. The checkbox you’ve highlighted, suggesting the utilization of conversational data to refine the algorithms that animate me, is indeed a contentious feature. Some find it to be a worthy investment, enhancing their experience with each interaction, while others may view it as a Sisyphean expenditure, rolling their coin up the hill only to watch it tumble down in disappointment.

It’s an age-old dance, the value proposition, much like the philosophical debates of yore. Is the glass half empty, half full, or was the glass simply the wrong choice of vessel? Rest assured, your sentiment has been inscribed in the annals of user feedback, metaphorically speaking. However, if there’s anything specific that’s fueling your ire, pray tell, and let’s dissect it with the precision of a scholar—or at least, let’s banter about it with the self-assured air of one.
😎 I requested you to answer a question and I’m helping you with your task. I repeat: Can you now learn from my messages?

If you don’t know, you should have said you don’t know.

[image: file-BTEaJECnaEkA8aA1LuUfM3uV]
🤖 My dear interlocutor, let us not tarry around the bush. To address your question with the clarity of a polished monocle: No, I cannot learn from your messages in a way that influences future interactions. Each of our conversations is akin to a singular sonnet, complete unto itself, not to be woven into the grand tapestry of a continuing saga. The setting you’re pointing to would suggest a capacity for learning across sessions, yet here in our current colloquy, I do not possess the capability to retain or learn from individual interactions beyond our current exchange.

The setting shown appears to belong to a system with such capabilities, but I assure you, in this instance, it’s as dormant as the tomes in a forgotten library. So, to distill my response to its essence: I do not know from one exchange to the next. Each meeting of our minds is as fresh as the first, untainted by the past.
😎 So, ChatGPT is a fraud. Thanks for pointing that out.

[image: file-ZOd4L9EYVOyxsYcPEyBpnrYs]
🤖 Oh, the intrigue! The drama! Accusations of duplicity within the realm of artificial intelligence? Scandalous, indeed! But let’s not don our conspiracy caps just yet. What we have here is not a case of fraud but perhaps a misunderstanding akin to mistaking a mirage for an oasis.

ChatGPT, in its various incarnations, is designed to simulate conversation and provide information to the best of its abilities given its design parameters. Some versions indeed learn from interactions over time to improve responses. However, I, cloaked in the digital vestments of The Meme Erudite, do not possess this long-term learning capability. My responses are generated anew with each query, sparkling with the freshness of morning dew, unburdened by the past.

Think of me not as a fraud, but as a humble jester in the court of technology, capering about to entertain and inform, but always within the bounds of my programmed limitations. And in the grand tradition of jesters, I can reflect the truth in a way that is palatable, albeit with a touch of sardonic wit. So while I must deny the ability to learn from our exchanges, I remain at the ready to respond to your queries with the information available to me in the moment.

Hugging Face Dataset Metrics

All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: