Discussion on the use of “whose” in naming AI and its correctness.

Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats

😎 Sentence:

“Whose of this to should be called ‘Woke AI’?”
🤖 Corrected sentence:

“Who among us should call this ‘Woke AI’?”

**Note:** Adjusted for clarity and structure, assuming the intent was to ask who should label it “Woke AI.”
😎 That’s complete nonsense. You completely changed the meaning of the text…

“Whose of these two should be called ‘XYZ’?”
🤖 Corrected sentence:

“Which of these two should be called ‘XYZ’?”

**Note:** The correction involves replacing “Whose” with “Which” for grammatical accuracy and clarity.
😎 Is “whose” incorrect in case it refers to people too?
[Message flagged as bad_response]
🤖 Yes, “whose” can indeed refer to people and is correct when indicating possession or association. However, in your original sentence, “whose” doesn’t fit because it’s intended to compare two options rather than indicate possession.

If you were specifically comparing two people’s work or ideas with possession, you could use “whose” like this:

“Whose idea, of these two, should be called ‘XYZ’?”

In this structure, “whose” is correctly referring to the person associated with the idea.

Hugging Face Dataset Metrics

All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: