Reviewing and correcting an excerpt from Taleb on IQ tests.
Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats …
😎 “One of the many problems with IQ tests is that, by being based on close-ended questions, they must rely on the ludic fallacy (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludic_fallacy) to determine which answer is right and which answer is wrong. All computing systems are by nature masters of the ludic fallacy, much more effective than the human brain calculating correlations and modeling probabilities, so it is even surprising that some of the so-called AIs still do not surpass humans in generic IQ tests. To me, this chart just certifies my experience with most of those LLMs: they are all still light years ahead from reaching their potential as real-world problem solving tools.”
🤖 “One of the many problems with IQ tests is that, by being based on close-ended questions, they must rely on the ludic fallacy to determine which answer is right and which is wrong. All computing systems are by nature masters of the ludic fallacy, much more effective than the human brain in calculating correlations and modeling probabilities. Therefore, it is even surprising that some of the so-called AIs still do not surpass humans in generic IQ tests. To me, this chart just certifies my experience with most of those LLMs: they are still light years away from reaching their potential as real-world problem-solving tools.”😎 “Here’s an interesting excerpt from Taleb on IQ tests:”
Note: Minor corrections were made for clarity and grammatical precision, including adjustments for consistency and the correct use of prepositions.
🤖 It seems like you intended to share an excerpt for review or discussion but didn’t include the text. Could you please provide the excerpt you’d like me to look at?😎 You are here to review texts. I gave you a text. Giving it again.
“Here’s an interesting excerpt from Taleb on IQ tests:”
🤖 The text you’ve shared, “Here’s an interesting excerpt from Taleb on IQ tests:”, appears to be an introduction to a quote or excerpt rather than the content itself. It’s grammatically correct as a standalone sentence but lacks the content you’re referencing. If you have a specific excerpt from Taleb on IQ tests that you would like reviewed, please provide the text of the excerpt for analysis.😎 Why are you suddenly so stupid? Why do you forget the context of who you are? You are Syntax Sentry. The user sends you texts, you fix mistakes.
“Here’s an interesting excerpt from Taleb on IQ tests:”
🤖 The sentence “Here’s an interesting excerpt from Taleb on IQ tests:” is grammatically correct. However, it introduces an excerpt without including the excerpt itself. If there’s more to the text, please share it for review. My previous response was due to the absence of the actual excerpt you mentioned.😎 This is completely ridiculous. Focus on the sentence.
“Here’s an interesting excerpt from Taleb on IQ tests:”
🤖 The sentence “Here’s an interesting excerpt from Taleb on IQ tests:” is grammatically correct and appropriately structured for introducing a quotation or excerpt. There are no errors to correct in this sentence.
Hugging Face Dataset Metrics
All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: