Discussion on philosophical article writing and clarity in language usage
Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats …
😎 “To end the post, I chose a conversation about a philosophical topic, which I’ve curated in the ‘new signature style of this website’ (the emoji family grows: ✍️😎🧠🤖). The chosen topic is one I’ve thought and talked about before in different contexts (posted on Medium: People Don’t Want to Work?): why people of all sorts and in all contexts have a natural tendency to ‘play victim’. Passing it through o1, assigning the task of writing an article citing reliable and relevant references was enjoyable, instructive, and revealing of the expanded capabilities that ‘reasoning models’ bring to writing and research. ”
🤖 “To end the post, I chose a conversation about a philosophical topic, which I’ve curated in the ‘new signature style of this website’ (the emoji family grows: ✍️😎🧠🤖). The chosen topic is one I’ve thought about and discussed in various contexts (posted on Medium: People Don’t Want to Work?): why people of all kinds and in all situations have a natural tendency to ‘play victim.’ Passing it through o1 and assigning the task of writing an article citing reliable and relevant references was enjoyable, instructive, and revealing of the expanded capabilities that ‘reasoning models’ bring to writing and research.”😎 what’s wrong with “different contexts”. EXPLAIN ASSERTIVELY
**Note:** Minor corrections were made to verb usage and sentence structure for clarity and consistency.
🤖 “Different contexts” isn’t inherently wrong, but in this case, it is less precise than “various contexts.” The phrase “different contexts” often implies a contrast or a comparison between specific contexts, while “various contexts” suggests multiple instances without necessarily implying a difference between them. Here, the intention seems to be about having thought and talked about the topic across multiple settings, not necessarily contrasting them. Therefore, “various contexts” provides a clearer, more accurate description of the range of situations mentioned.😎 “revealing of the expanded capabilities that ‘reasoning models’ bring to writing and research. ” Is “revealing of the…” a good and natural wording? Simply answer the question now
🤖 No, “revealing of the…” is not natural. It would be better as “revealing the…”😎 But that wouldn’t make sense in the sentence. The sentence tries to find an adjective to continue the series: enjoyable, instructive… BUT OBVIOUSLY AN ADJECTIVE IS NOT SUFFICIENT. JUST NEEDS TO STATE HOW THIS “reveals the expanded capabilities that ‘reasoning models’ bring to writing and research.
🤖 In that case, a more fitting continuation could be:😎 Improve it. “A reveleation” does not sound good to me
“…was enjoyable, instructive, and a revelation of the expanded capabilities that ‘reasoning models’ bring to writing and research.”
This maintains the intended descriptive flow while clarifying the revealing nature of the task.
🤖 “…was enjoyable, instructive, and revealing in its demonstration of the expanded capabilities that ‘reasoning models’ bring to writing and research.”😎 “I don’t think a clarification is needed, but the text I paste here is not simply the prompts, answers, and chains of thought (for this conversation, I exclude the CoTs). All LLM-produced texts are curated, filtered, and enriched with inline links, images, and other edits until I finally obtain a product I want to share.”
🤖 “I don’t think a clarification is needed, but the text I paste here is not simply the prompts, answers, and chains of thought (I exclude the CoTs for this conversation). All LLM-produced texts are curated, filtered, and enriched with inline links, images, and other edits until I finally obtain a product I want to share.”
**Note:** Minor adjustments were made for clarity and flow.
Hugging Face Dataset Metrics
All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: