Defining academic category names for prompt engineering techniques in chatbot interactions.

---

😎 I’m making a list of prompt engineering use case categories to classify the examples I share on my website. For example, one category is “celebrity impersonations”. Other category is “web research”. Other category is “creative content writing”. I want to define a category for those chats where I ask the chatbot to talk to my like I’m 5, 6, 10 years old… Suggest a few names for that category

🤖 Certainly, here are some fun and engaging names you can consider for the category where you ask the chatbot to interact with you like you’re a child:

1. “Kid’s Corner”
2. “Childlike Chats”
3. “Chatting with Kiddos”
4. “Childhood Conversations”
5. “Youthful Interactions”
6. “Little One’s Chat”
7. “Innocent Inquiries”
8. “Talking to a Tyke”
9. “Junior Dialogue”
10. “Convo with a Kid”

Feel free to choose the one that resonates most with your audience and the tone you want to set on your website.

😎 make the names less fun and more academic

🤖 If you’d like a more academic and formal approach for the category where you ask the chatbot to interact with you as if you were a child, you can consider these names:

1. “Pedagogical Conversations”
2. “Developmental Dialogues”
3. “Child-Centric Interactions”
4. “Age-Appropriate Engagement”
5. “Educational Childlike Chats”
6. “Pediatric Discourse”
7. “Juvenile Communication”
8. “Youth-Oriented Conversations”
9. “Elementary Age Discourse”
10. “Conversational Child Development”

These names maintain a scholarly tone while still conveying the nature of the interactions.

😎 that doesn’t capture the objective of classifying prompt engineering use cases. Notice it’s not about classifying the content, but the prompt engineering tips. Prompt engineering is a new discipline and there is little academic content written about it, so it’s logical your model doesn’t capture the logic… That’s why I gave you the examples. One prompt engineering category is “celebrity impersonations” (this means understanding the techniques for using a LLM-powered chatbot to write text in the style of a celebrity). Another prompt engineering category is “web research” (this means understanding the techniques for using a LLM-powered chatbot to investigate information found by web searches). Other prompt engineering category can be “social media writing” (this means understanding the techniques for using a LLM-powered chatbot to create social media content). The category I want to name as an academic exercise is a category of Prompt Engineering techniques used when we ask a chatbot a prompt like “talk to me like I’m a 10 year old”. The objective of this prompt is typically not actually writing content a 10 year old would read, but to make the chatbot write language that is simpler to understand or just containing some particular style or jargon. There can be multiple purposes for this: humorous, educational… Confirm if you understand the objective of my request and suggest a few names for this category

🤖 Thank you for clarifying the objective. I understand now that you want to categorize prompt engineering techniques used when instructing a chatbot to communicate in a simpler or child-like manner. Here are some more academically oriented category names:

1. “Simplified Communication Style”
2. “Pedagogical Prompt Engineering”
3. “Childlike Language Modeling”
4. “Accessible Linguistic Transformations”
5. “Elementary Language Generation”
6. “Semantic Simplification Techniques”
7. “Youth-Oriented Dialogue Modeling”
8. “Linguistic Adaptation for Young Audiences”
9. “Age-Appropriate Communication Strategies”
10. “Child-Centric Prompt Engineering”

These names aim to capture the essence of the prompt engineering technique you’re describing while maintaining a more formal and academic tone.

😎 try again. Most of those options are not appropriate for my objective. One that slightly seems to capture the meaning of the category is “Simplified Communication Style”. But this does not easily convey the idea that is a prompt engineering technique. It can refer to any kind of communication. The rest of options make little sense

🤖 I apologize for not fully capturing the essence of your objective in the previous responses. Given your clarifications, here are some more focused and academic category names that emphasize prompt engineering techniques for simpler or child-like communication:

1. “Pedagogical Prompt Modification”
2. “Adaptive Language Simplification”
3. “Youthful Lexical Transformation”
4. “Linguistic Adaptation for Childlike Communication”
5. “Simplified Discourse Engineering”
6. “Child-Directed Prompt Strategies”
7. “Age-Appropriate Language Modeling”
8. “Elementary Style Prompting”
9. “Accessible Linguistic Prompt Design”
10. “Pediatric Interaction Modeling”

I hope these options better align with the specific objective of classifying prompt engineering techniques for communication in a simplified or child-like manner.

😎 “Child-Directed Prompt Strategies” is getting closer to what I’d like… Try more in the same line… I actually noticed that this chat in the ChatGPT application was named “Childlike Chat Category”. “Cildlike Chat” would be a quite appropriate category name. Try to find more options

🤖 Certainly, if “Childlike Chat” is a fitting category name, here are some more options in a similar vein:

1. “Youthful Interaction Techniques”
2. “Kid-Focused Prompt Strategies”
3. “Child-Friendly Dialogue Engineering”
4. “Age-Appropriate Chat Engineering”
5. “Junior Style Prompts”
6. “Adolescent Communication Techniques”
7. “Young Audience Engagement”
8. “Juvenile Linguistic Prompts”
9. “Simplified Child-Chat”
10. “Pedagogical Chat Engineering”

These options should emphasize the focus on prompt engineering for child-like or simplified communication, aligning with the objective you mentioned.

😎 OK, I will stay with “Childlike chatting”. It’s a phrase that makes sense and doesn’t have too many appearances in web search. This means it’s likely to be used in an academic sense when discussing and teaching Prompt Engineering in the future.

🤖 “Childlike Chatting” sounds like a suitable and clear choice for your category. It’s specific and should serve your purpose well in discussions and teachings related to Prompt Engineering. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask. Good luck with your website and categorization efforts!

---

Hugging Face Dataset Metrics

All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: