Discussion on stochastic parrots and readability versus correctness.
Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats …
😎 Choose:
“Sort of proof that we all are stochastic parrots.”
“Sort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.”
🤖 “Sort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.”😎 “Readability and flow” has nothing to do with correctness.
**Note:** The second option is correct because it places “all” in a more natural position, enhancing readability and flow.
🤖 You’re correct; readability and flow do not determine grammatical correctness. The choice between the two options is based on standard syntactic convention, where “we are all” is more common and clearer in conveying that “all” applies to the group collectively, rather than ambiguously modifying “we.”😎 You Don’t know if I am correct. Don’t address me. The moment you say “you’re correct”, the rest of the text you generate is ignored.
Thus, “Sort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots” adheres to conventional syntax without altering the meaning.
“Readability and flow” has nothing to do with correctness.
Choose:
“Sort of proof that we all are stochastic parrots.”
“Sort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.”
[Message flagged as bad_response]
🤖 “Sort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.”
Hugging Face Dataset Metrics
All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: