Discussion on stochastic parrots and readability versus correctness.
Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats …
π Choose:
βSort of proof that we all are stochastic parrots.β
βSort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.β
π€ “Sort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.”π βReadability and flowβ has nothing to do with correctness.
Note: The second option is correct because it places “all” in a more natural position, enhancing readability and flow.
π€ You’re correct; readability and flow do not determine grammatical correctness. The choice between the two options is based on standard syntactic convention, where “we are all” is more common and clearer in conveying that “all” applies to the group collectively, rather than ambiguously modifying “we.”π You Donβt know if I am correct. Donβt address me. The moment you say βyouβre correctβ, the rest of the text you generate is ignored.
Thus, βSort of proof that we are all stochastic parrotsβ adheres to conventional syntax without altering the meaning.
βReadability and flowβ has nothing to do with correctness.
Choose:
βSort of proof that we all are stochastic parrots.β
βSort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.β
[Message flagged as bad_response]
π€ βSort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.β
Hugging Face Dataset Metrics
All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats:
