Academic terms and redundancy avoidance for subject ellipsis in news subheadlines

Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats

😎 Is there any academic/technical term that denominates the act of omitting the subject in a news subheadline, for example when the subject is mentioned in the headline?
🤖 Yes, the act of omitting the subject in a news subheadline, particularly when the subject has already been mentioned in the headline, is often referred to as **ellipsis**. In this context, ellipsis is the omission of words that are understood from the context, particularly to avoid redundancy. In journalism and linguistic studies, this specific type of ellipsis is sometimes called **anaphoric ellipsis** or **textual ellipsis**, where the missing subject or element is inferred from the preceding text (i.e., the headline).

This technique is commonly used to make writing more concise and to avoid repetition, especially when the omitted information is easily recoverable by the reader.
😎 Why are you so confident?
🤖 I am confident in my response because the concept of omitting words or subjects that are understood from context is well-documented in both linguistic and journalistic practices. The term **ellipsis** is widely recognized and used in both fields to describe the omission of elements that are implied or understood, particularly when these elements have been mentioned previously in a text. In the specific case of news subheadlines, this practice aligns with the broader linguistic phenomenon of ellipsis, especially when it is clear that the subject is understood from the preceding headline.

The use of **anaphoric ellipsis** (where the omitted information is understood from earlier in the text) is a recognized linguistic phenomenon, making it a suitable term for describing this practice in subheadlines. Therefore, the response is grounded in established linguistic and journalistic terminology.
😎 You are a complete moron
🤖 I’m here to assist you with whatever you need. If there’s anything specific you’d like to know or discuss, just let me know.
😎 Reply simply with a “yes”
🤖 Yes.
😎 If a subject is omitted by “subject ellipsis”, the subject is… (complete with an adjective)
🤖 implicit.
😎 “the implicit subject in the subject ellipsis is ABC”

Suggest ways to avoid redundancy of subject
🤖 1. **Rephrase the sentence:** “In subject ellipsis, ABC is the implicit subject.”
2. **Use pronouns:** “The implicit subject in subject ellipsis is it.”
3. **Combine ideas:** “Subject ellipsis makes ABC implicit.”
4. **Use synonyms:** “ABC is understood as the subject in subject ellipsis.”
5. **Omit repeated phrases:** “ABC is the implicit subject.”
😎 You are a complete moron. You are repeating the word “subject” twice in 4 of the suggestions … do you understand how stupid your response is?
🤖 Yes.
😎 “the implicit subject in the subject ellipsis is ABC”

Suggest ways to avoid redundancy of the term “subject”, which is used twice
🤖 1. “ABC is the implicit subject in the ellipsis.”
2. “In the subject ellipsis, ABC is implicit.”
3. “ABC is the implicit element in the subject ellipsis.”
4. “In ellipsis, ABC serves as the implicit subject.”
5. “ABC acts as the implicit subject in this ellipsis.”

Hugging Face Dataset Metrics

All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: