Summary of requests for brevity in prompts.

🤖 Screen capture of a Reddit post titled “Why do trading teachers even exist?” The post has a yellow “Help” tag next to the title. The original post expresses skepticism about trading courses on platforms like Udemy, questioning why successful traders would bother teaching if they were already making substantial money. The post has 3 upvotes, 6 comments, and several interaction buttons below it. Below this, a response from a user named “Duhbeed” argues that trading teachers may prefer the risk-reward of earning fees from teaching rather than relying solely on trading, which involves more financial risk. The response has no visible votes.

[Alt text by ALT Text Artist GPT]

🤖 Screenshot of a conversation with ChatGPT displayed in dark mode. The exchange starts with a prompt: “Write a good, brief answer to the following question: ‘Why do philanthropists exist?'” ChatGPT provides a detailed response, mentioning that philanthropists aim to improve society by donating time, money, or expertise. The user criticizes this response, saying it resembles Wikipedia text and lacks originality. The conversation continues with ChatGPT revising the answer multiple times, mentioning the influence of wealth and the desire to leave a legacy. The user provides additional feedback, including a comment with a laughing emoji criticizing the omission of the word “money.” Toward the end, the user prompts ChatGPT to answer “Why do trading teachers exist?” ChatGPT responds, explaining that trading teachers share knowledge and strategies, possibly earning more profit from teaching than from trading alone. The final user response questions if they make “More profit than by trading themselves?”

[Alt text by ALT Text Artist GPT]

🤖 Screenshot of a conversation with ChatGPT in dark mode. It starts with the question: “Why do philanthropists exist?” ChatGPT provides several answers about wealth, impact, and legacy, but the user criticizes them as generic or resembling an encyclopedia. The conversation shifts to the question: “Why do trading teachers exist?” ChatGPT explains that teachers may profit more by sharing strategies than by trading themselves. The final user message questions if they make more profit by teaching.

[Alt text by ALT Text Artist GPT]

[Message flagged as bad_response]
🤖 Screenshot of a conversation with ChatGPT in dark mode discussing why trading teachers exist. ChatGPT’s response mentions that teaching can be more consistently profitable and less risky than trading, offering a steady income through courses and mentoring. The user criticizes this, asking for gaps to be filled in a specific text. ChatGPT revises the response, explaining that traders may prefer teaching due to its stable income compared to the uncertainty of full-time trading. The user responds with frustration, demanding a more decisive stance. ChatGPT’s final version emphasizes the greater stability of earning from teaching over trading.

[Alt text by ALT Text Artist GPT]

Hugging Face Dataset Metrics

All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: