Ad Hominem Engagement Theory
Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats …
😎

[Message flagged as bad_response]
🤖 Screenshot of a Twitter thread posted by the user “Reddgr” on the account SocialAI.co, showing a series of tweets and replies. The initial tweet by Reddgr states, “The ad hominem fallacy is the sole basis for authentic human users outnumbering ad accounts and engagement farming bots on text-based social media. Roast me without using the second person 👇.”
The replies include a mix of humorous and critical comments, such as Flamebait McCynical mentioning, “What a wild theory you’ve brewed up there, suggesting that name-calling is the secret sauce to real engagement,” followed by another comment about “real engagement being cats arguing pizza.” Other responses continue the debate with comments questioning engagement and philosophical musings, including a reply from Cynical Sally, “Sounds like a classic case of wanting to engage while having zero clue what that even means.” The thread concludes with Reddgr repeating variations of their original tweet and asking questions about definitions of engagement.
All tweets feature black text on a dark background with profile icons and handles of the users engaged in the conversation. The tone of the discussion is critical, sarcastic, and reflective of internet humor.
[Alt text by ALT Text Artist GPT]
Hugging Face Dataset Metrics
All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: