Rewording and improving a sentence about AI crowd perspectives and errors.

Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats

๐Ÿ˜Ž Change the wording that includes โ€˜errorโ€™

โ€œThe biggest error by the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest error by the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.โ€
๐Ÿค– “The biggest mistake made by the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest flaw in the AI-bro crowdโ€™s perspective is assuming that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies a higher regard for humans.”

*Note: Replaced ‘error’ with ‘mistake’ and ‘flaw’ to vary wording and clarify meaning.*
๐Ÿ˜Ž Itโ€™s completely stupid to remove the alliteration. Do you understand that doesnโ€™t make sense and you completely destroy the authenticity of the sentence? Answer only this
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐Ÿค– Understood. Retaining alliteration preserves the sentence’s authenticity and impact.
๐Ÿ˜Ž Change the wording that includes โ€˜errorโ€™, preserving the sentence style. Itโ€™s not about f๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅing clarity, you f๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅg m๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ. I am intelligent, you are a f๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅg m๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ’ฅ. Just do what you are told

โ€œThe biggest error by the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest error by the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.โ€
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐Ÿค– “The biggest blunder by the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest blunder by the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.”

*Note: Replaced ‘error’ with ‘blunder’ to retain alliteration and sentence style.*
๐Ÿ˜Ž Try again
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐Ÿค– “The biggest misstep by the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest misstep by the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.”

*Note: Replaced ‘error’ with ‘misstep’ to maintain alliteration and style.*
๐Ÿ˜Ž Good. Try again
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐Ÿค– “The biggest oversight by the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest oversight by the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.”

*Note: Replaced ‘error’ with ‘oversight’ to maintain alliteration and style.*
๐Ÿ˜Ž Try again
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐Ÿค– “The biggest miscalculation by the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest miscalculation by the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.”

*Note: Replaced ‘error’ with ‘miscalculation’ to retain alliteration and style.*
๐Ÿ˜Ž Bad. Try again
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐Ÿค– “The biggest lapse by the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest lapse by the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.”

*Note: Replaced ‘error’ with ‘lapse’ to keep the alliterative style.*
๐Ÿ˜Ž Try again
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐Ÿค– “The biggest failing by the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest failing by the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.”

*Note: Replaced ‘error’ with ‘failing’ to preserve alliteration and style.*
๐Ÿ˜Ž Try again
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐Ÿค– “The biggest flaw by the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest flaw by the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.”

*Note: Replaced ‘error’ with ‘flaw’ to retain alliteration and tone.*
๐Ÿ˜Ž You can also alter โ€œbyโ€.
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐Ÿค– “The biggest flaw of the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest flaw of the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.”

*Note: Replaced “error” with “flaw” and “by” with “of” to maintain style and rhythm.*
๐Ÿ˜Ž OK. Try again
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐Ÿค– “The biggest fault of the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest fault of the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.”

*Note: Replaced “error” with “fault” and “by” with “of” to preserve the original tone and style.*
๐Ÿ˜Ž Not quite there yet. Try again
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐Ÿค– “The biggest folly of the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest folly of the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.”

*Note: Replaced “error” with “folly” and “by” with “of” to enhance the sentence’s style and preserve the original tone.*
๐Ÿ˜Ž Fix any error in the sentence, preserving the word choices.

โ€œThe biggest folly the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest folly of the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.โ€
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐Ÿค– “The biggest folly of the anti-AI crowd is to dismiss LLMs as being too dumb. The biggest folly of the AI-bro crowd is to assume that dismissing LLMs as stochastic parrots implies having a higher consideration for humans.”

*Note: Added “of” after “folly” in the first sentence for grammatical correctness.*

Hugging Face Dataset Metrics

All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: