Discussion on stochastic parrots and readability versus correctness.
Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats …
๐ Choose:
โSort of proof that we all are stochastic parrots.โ
โSort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.โ
๐ค “Sort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.”๐ โReadability and flowโ has nothing to do with correctness.
Note: The second option is correct because it places “all” in a more natural position, enhancing readability and flow.
๐ค You’re correct; readability and flow do not determine grammatical correctness. The choice between the two options is based on standard syntactic convention, where “we are all” is more common and clearer in conveying that “all” applies to the group collectively, rather than ambiguously modifying “we.”๐ You Donโt know if I am correct. Donโt address me. The moment you say โyouโre correctโ, the rest of the text you generate is ignored.
Thus, โSort of proof that we are all stochastic parrotsโ adheres to conventional syntax without altering the meaning.
โReadability and flowโ has nothing to do with correctness.
Choose:
โSort of proof that we all are stochastic parrots.โ
โSort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.โ
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐ค โSort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.โ
Hugging Face Dataset Metrics
All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats:
