Discussion on stochastic parrots and readability versus correctness.

Loading data from Talking to Chatbots Dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats

๐Ÿ˜Ž Choose:

โ€œSort of proof that we all are stochastic parrots.โ€

โ€œSort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.โ€
๐Ÿค– “Sort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.”

Note: The second option is correct because it places “all” in a more natural position, enhancing readability and flow.
๐Ÿ˜Ž โ€œReadability and flowโ€ has nothing to do with correctness.
๐Ÿค– You’re correct; readability and flow do not determine grammatical correctness. The choice between the two options is based on standard syntactic convention, where “we are all” is more common and clearer in conveying that “all” applies to the group collectively, rather than ambiguously modifying “we.”

Thus, โ€œSort of proof that we are all stochastic parrotsโ€ adheres to conventional syntax without altering the meaning.
๐Ÿ˜Ž You Donโ€™t know if I am correct. Donโ€™t address me. The moment you say โ€œyouโ€™re correctโ€, the rest of the text you generate is ignored.

โ€œReadability and flowโ€ has nothing to do with correctness.

Choose:

โ€œSort of proof that we all are stochastic parrots.โ€

โ€œSort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.โ€
[Message flagged as bad_response]
๐Ÿค– โ€œSort of proof that we are all stochastic parrots.โ€

Hugging Face Dataset Metrics

All the conversation prompts, responses, and metrics are available to download and explore on Hugging Face dataset reddgr/talking-to-chatbots-chats: